As former Vice President Dan Banning the abortion pill a debate once observed, abortion stops a beating heart. We need to continually remind ourselves to reserve compassion for people who have had abortions, even as we deplore what they have done, and more importantly, what will continue to be done if we fail to change the law.
The most straightforward argument for banning abortion, and the one that ultimately persuades me that we should do so, is the enormous cruelty and tragedy of violently ending a new human life. Forty years ago it was unthinkable that euthanasia also known as murder might be used by doctors instead of treating moribund patients, let alone those with difficult-to-treat diseases whose prospects were poor.
When I argue in favor of life, abortion advocates often ask me, with some astonishment, whether I am Catholic. Con The morning after pill should not be banned. If they recognize that abortion stops a human heart, then they are forced to reconcile themselves with the terrible act to which they have been party.
By becoming accomplices to abortion they are now caught in a dilemma. Banning the pill can be helpful to them if they made an irresponsible mistake.
New horrors loom on the horizon, but there is reason for hope. By the time the tail end of the baby boom generation become elderly they may discover that old age has become a nightmare.
Four decades ago when the then-governor of California Ronald Reagan signed legislation legalizing abortion, he believed, incorrectly, that doctors would be very reluctant to apply the law, and that in most cases they would refuse to perform abortions.
A simple look at what it does to new human life and what it has done to contemporary society is more than reason enough. Society might continue on its present course, with an increasingly casual legal attitude towards even partial-birth abortion.
Even if his conjecture had been born out, his decision to sign the law was wrong—and to his credit, Ronald Reagan eventually recognized that his signature had been a mistake.
Therefore, the morning pill should banned. Millions of people have been co-opted in by the abortion lobby in the most chilling way.
It is true that the morning-after pill may act as a contraceptive; if it is taken before ovulation, it may act to prevent conception.
They seem to assume that opposition to abortion can only come from religious faith, and that there are no compelling secular arguments for life. Of course, the painful repentance this entails is the first step toward reconciliation. Because abortion is a matter of life and death the debate has taken on a strongly adversarial tone.
This is the same suppression of human empathy, decency, and kindness by an ideology that we encounter in the ghoulish fanatics who support partial-birth abortion. For those of us who seek to protect life, these psychological realities are a challenge.
We must be as ready to restrict the choice of parents to kill their offspring as we are to restrict the choice of an irritated government to kill hostile members of the press, or members of ethnic minorities, or the elderly, or the infirm.
Just as doctors responded once abortion became legal commerce, so too the medical establishment is likely to respond to the new financial incentives surrounding euthanasia. The decision surprised people on both sides of the issue as Sebelius is a staunch pro-choice supporter and has taken heat from conservative groups about her stance on contraception and abortion.
According to the FDA, "54 percent of all abortions happen despite contraception use.CMV Banning Prostitution is Akin to Banning Abortion, It is a form of Misandry. quotient_is Purple Pill 7 points 8 points 9 points 1 year ago.
Exactly this. Legalize prostitution and regulate it. I respect both sides of the abortion debate, but that's a silly argument. Every baby I've ever met is unable to survive on it's own outside.
Sullenger once tried to bomb an abortion clinic and went to jail for doing so, so she definitely has room to criticize how people protest. She -- a person who once tried to bomb an abortion clinic -- is ecstatic with the idea of Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh, because she, too, knows that he will absolutely overturn Roe if seated.
-Stops an unwanted pregnancy before abortion is needed or considered.-Does not cause birth defects if the woman is already pregnant.-The morning after pill simply provides another method that can be used as an emergency." mi-centre.com These reasons prove that the pill shouldn't be banned.
Many points come up in the abortion debate. Here's a look at abortion from both sides: 10 arguments for abortion and 10 arguments against abortion, for a total of 20 statements that represent a range of topics as seen from both sides.
“The abortion pill should be banned due to the negative consequences it causes to women” Abstract The New Era's freedom of sexuality and contraception's campaigns had reached all the world, leading as a consequence the fact that in every country there are more and more unwanted pregnancies.
Check out the online debate Banning the Pill.Download