Difference between earthquakes in ledcs and

This is more critical in LEDCs as the areas are deprived to begin with. This caused a great financial problem for the cities inhabitants, as the taxes would have to rise and also the government because large amounts of money would be needed to rebuild. San Francisco was modern as ever with large and long bridges and bays, and plenty rural areas.

They then sell these raw materials to MEDCs for relatively low prices. This can benefit the local population, however, that is not always the case as the money spent by tourists is not always put back into the local economy to improve conditions and infrastructure.

Mexico City Built on a dried up lake bed, Mexico City one of the worlds most densely populated cities with buildings tall but cheaply built was hit by an earthquake that wiped out nearly everything. In Mexico City where most of the population was poor, rescue teams and firefighters had not been summoned and organized.

Earthquakes mainly occur near the edges of plate boundaries. LEDCs are the countries which produce many of the worlds raw materials. This is partly because MEDCs have higher incomes and the demands for energy resources is high. Nutrition, more specifically malnutrition, can lead to lowered life expectancies.

Conservative plate boundaries move side by side each other in similar or different directions and when they rub against each other this causes friction and then the release of pressure causes an earthquake.

Even if San Francisco has the technology and all the measurements are taken to predict an earthquake or any other disaster, some disasters can happen anytime and very suddenly.

Most of the buildings, schools, political buildings, statues, office buildings that were supposed to be earthquake proof, were all destroyed and after the incident and lay in pieces on the ground.

Difference Between Earthquakes in Ledcs and Medcs

San Francisco San Francisco, in one of Americas largest and most populated Difference between earthquakes in ledcs and at the time, far ahead of other cities its size when it came to technology. This earthquake, in the highly populated San Francisco might have killed only 63 and injured many more but the economic impacts were great as buildings were destroyed, bridges collapsed and fires blazed through the city destroying anything in their path.

Can be used alongside the AQA B Geography textbook Can be easily adapted to your needs Leads up to an 8 mark exam question that the students can do. It is calculated that approximately buildings collapsed. The quality and availability of health care is a significant factor in life expectancy too.

If an MEDC had a gas leak it could cause a fire which would spread through the city like it did in the earthquake in San Francisco of In the third P we should invest money in scientists who can predict where the next earthquake is going to be; for example, near San Francisco there is a seismic gap on the northern American and pacific plate boundary, this means that the is a gap where no earthquakes have occurred recently which means that it is highly likely that there will be an earthquake there soon.

There were also skyscrapers and tall buildings, which towered over the population. MEDCs consume a lot of resources as they are wasteful, they also have more waste and pollution. An example of an earthquake proofed building is putting the building on wheels under the ground to try to make the building move with the earthquake.

We will be looking at the impacts of earthquakes in Lower Economically Developed Countries and More Economically Developed Countries, spotting the differences.

There are many earthquakes to study but we have chosen some of the most devastating ones that have occurs somewhere in the near past.

If buildings collapse or not also depends on where they are built. This because the older buildings that were not able to withstand the shock were destroyed and collapsed on top of the other buildings, which also collapsed, or they caught on fire which spread and in turn destroyed other buildings.

Some of the buildings in San Francisco are built on reclaimed and marshy land, which broke down or collapsed taking down the building with it when the actual earthquake happened. Obviously, if a disaster, or an earthquake in this case occurs somewhere densely populated rather an isolated area it will have a greater impact as life could be lost, buildings destroyed and as a result, high prices to pay.

LEDCs are the opposite with lower consumption as people do not have too much to spend. In fact, there were actually very little professional help, but there were many construction workers, employees and the public. Any disaster either caused by humans or Mother Nature will make an impact but this depends where it hits.

Destructive plate boundaries which crushes one plate under the other to form a subduction zone where pressure from the friction build up is released, causing an earthquake. Most of the southern hemisphere is less developed, while countries in the northern hemisphere are more developed.

An example of retrofitting a building would be putting rubber shock absorbers under the buildings to try and keep the building from shaking; also you could put a heavy roof weight on the roof to try to counter the shock waves.

As modern as it was, Mexico City was hit by an earthquake reading 8. Such a disaster was the earthquake, which read a strikingly high 7. Even though many of the buildings, possibly the newer ones, were earthquake proof or could withstand a great deal of shock they were also destroyed.

Why are earthquake impacts different in LEDCs and MEDCs?

Who do you think is worse off?MEDC's, having more money, therefore have more earthquake-resistant buildings compared to LEDC's.

For example, a modern building in an MEDC would include shock abosorbers under it, and a movable block on top, which can be controlled by computers to shift in the event of an earthquake, stabalising the building.

An example of a MEDC's earthquake is the magnitude Tohoku earthquake on March 11, which occurred near the northeast coast of Honshu, Japan. A LEDC is a less economically developed country and therefore cannot afford to spend money to protect the country from earthquakes. Earthquakes, MEDC vs LEDC San Andreas Fault The San Andreas Fault is located on the North American Plate and the Pacific Plate.

The fault travels miles along the curve North up America.

MEDC'S vs LEDC'S: Earthquakes

Seattle InSeattle, (an MEDC) there was an eruption measuring Because everyone was so prepared, barely anyone died except for 1 person. LEDCs will in general have more damage than MEDCs. In Hati, most of the city was destroyed, because they had little or no money to invest in earthquake proofing.

While in Christchurch, most of the city still stood after the first earthquake, due to being able to earthquake proof buildings. * Research and collect data how LEDCs and MEDCs are affected by earthquakes. * Explain what affects the strategies planned to overcome the aftereffects of earthquakes in LEDCs and MEDCs.

* Analyze precautions which are taken during earthquakes in LEDCs and MEDCs. * Collect data for supporting your views. Difference Between Earthquakes in Ledcs and Medcs. Why are earthquake impacts different in LEDCs and MEDCs? Any disaster either caused by humans or Mother Nature will make an impact but this depends where it hits.

Download
Difference between earthquakes in ledcs and
Rated 0/5 based on 22 review